I'm totaly aware of quotes from HBP herself, that seems to support this common view, that all what occure to myself is my self-inflicted Karma, which I declare here insolently as a misbelief. So what's above a quote from Original Theosophy? Common sense (as HBP declared by herself) and logic. So I would not need any (contrary) quotes in this case to show, that this is indeed a misbelief (even if there are quotes, which, f.e., understand Devachan also as a compensation for undeserved life-experiences).
Because, if this misbelief would be true, then there wouldn't be any freewill, at least in all activity we do towards other people. F.e., if I make a gift to someone or an insult, whatever, if this -- or what it feels like to that person etc. -- would be only the self-inflicted Karma of this other person I act towards, my own action would be or has to be predetermined in every case. But determination or predestination is the opposite of freewill.
And does it not feel wrong, to say, f.e., to a raped woman or a woman that lost her child, that this is only their own guilt, their own self-inflicted Karma? Of course, someone could counter, that's Karma from previous incarnations, but the woman do not know about this former lives, we know nothing about circumstances of such karma and from that point of view, we would also have to thank the rapist and the murder of the child, as noble messengers of Karma, instead to convict them.
It's worth to think about it, and the crucial implications of this misbelief, that everything what happens to me is deserved and caused by me, without any exception. There is, at least for the common sensed man, no doubt, that we own a freewill, as more free, as more spiritual or virtuous we live and furhtermore, what I try to explain, is not against Theosophy:
Well, then, tell me generally how you describe this law of Karma?: We describe Karma as that Law of readjustment which ever tends to restore disturbed equilibrium in the physical, and broken harmony in the moral world. We say that Karma does not act in this or that particular way always; but that it always does act so as to restore Harmony and preserve the balance of equilibrium, in virtue of which the Universe exists. (HPB, Key to Theosophy, Mysteries of Reincarnation)
Karma errs not, in the end, but it has to balance the consequence of freewill and without the latter, there would be no "Karma" (in the meaning of Disharmony) at all. So, I earn my self-inflicted Karma for every action of mine in this world, equal whether it is physically or mentally done, but not every circumstances that befall me, are deserved or caused by me (or the reincarnating ego), even if it could be so, because life is an interaction among many self-responsible freewills.
What do you think?